One Less HPV Vaccine Could Up Your Chances of Cervical Cancer by 44 Percent

In case you didn't know, HPV (Human Papillomavirus) is usually found among sexually active females. It has also been found that most healthy female bodies will fight against this virus on it's own and will successfully rid itself of the virus without any medical intervention. The only danger of cervical cancer developing would be in the instance of persistent re-infection.

So why are we blasting ads on TV and in the news media, along with government mandates for young school aged children? The Journal of the American Medical Association stated in their August 2007 issue that they found no reason to implement this vaccine and that there was no reliable proof that it did what it purported to do which was prevent cervical cancer.

How many physicians actually read their medical journals on a regular basis to get this information? If your's does not---perhaps you should question him on his own information as to the efficacy of this treatment.

Now add, that in the group of women who have persistent re-infection when given the vaccine, there is a 44% increased risk of precancerous cervical lesions and there can be no clear reason why any woman or child should be given this vaccine. The FDA report supporting this information was given by the very manufacturers of the HPV vaccine - Merck.

What about the adverse affects from the vaccine? Have you read any of the statistics? Probably not as these (as far as I know) have not been all over the newspapers and in TV ads. The public interest group, Judicial Watch, released documents obtained from the FDA that reported 1,637 adverse reactions prior to May 2007. There have been numerous reports of fainting, seizures, nausea, swelling of the injection sight, etc. There is also a report related to the number of deaths. Both reports can be downloaded from links on their web site.

The FDA report from Merck page 13, shows the statistics for those who have persistent re-infection. It should be very interesting to all those considering this vaccine that none of this information has been given the coverage that the actual vaccine promotion has been given. You can read the entire article by clicking on the first link on this page at the Natural News site.

Do your own research before having this vaccine given to your young daughters. What is the justification of mandating a vaccine for someone who might not ever become "sexually active"? Or someone who was sexually active but has now become celibate and her own body will take care of the problem, given the time it needs to heal itself?

Don't fall for the hype from the TV ads. They intentionally pull on your heartstrings to make you feel like you are doing the right thing. Their motives are entirely financial. A series of these vaccines (three are recommended), has a cost of $360. If they can get every young woman and female child vaccinated, what are the profits they are pulling in for the pharmaceutical that produces it? You or your daughter's ultimate health is not what they have in mind.

A vaccine against HPV was less likely to cervical cancer by 44 percent

In case you do not know, HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) is usually found in sexually active women. E 'was also found that women's bodies more healthy anti-virus itself and be able to eliminate the virus without any medical intervention. The only risk of developing cervical cancer is the case for the persistence of re-infection.

So why are we blowing up ads on television and media, with government mandatesyoung school children? The Journal of American Medical Association stated in its August 2007 found no reason for this vaccine and there was no reliable evidence that he did what he wanted to do this was to prevent cervical cancer.

How many doctors actually read their medical journals regularly to get this information? If you --- maybe you should ask about your personal information on the effectiveness of thistreatment.

Now add in the group of women who have persistent re-infection when the vaccine is 44% higher risk of precancerous cervical lesions and there can be no clear reason why any woman or child should receive this vaccine. The report of the FDA in support of this information was given by the manufacturers of the same HPV vaccine - Merck.

And the adverse effects of the vaccine? Have you read any statistics? Probably not as such (asI know) have not been in every newspaper and TV ads. The public interest group, Judicial Watch released documents obtained from the FDA, which has reported 1,637 adverse reactions before May 2007. There have been numerous reports of fainting, seizures, nausea, swelling of the eyes of injection, etc. There is also a report on the number of deaths. Both reports can be downloaded from the links on its website.

The FDA report of the Merck page 13, shows the statistics thathave re-persistent infection. Should be very interesting for everyone to consider this vaccine to any of this information has been given the coverage that the current vaccine has been given promotion. You can read the full article by clicking the first link to this page on the website of Natural News.

Do your own research before giving this vaccine for their daughters. What is the justification for a vaccine mandate for someone who never could become "sexually active"?Or someone who is sexually active, but is now celibate, and your body will take care of the problem, taking into account the time needed to heal himself?

Do not fall for the advertising campaign of television commercials. Intentionally pulling your heartstrings to make you feel as if you were doing the right thing. Their motives are entirely financial. Some of these vaccines (three are recommended), at a cost of $ 360. If you can get all the women and child vaccinated women, as profits arepulling for the pharmaceutical industry that produces it? You or the end of her daughter's health is not what you have in mind.