The causes of cervical cancer and effective treatments

The high profile of the recent death of Jade Goody, the star of the British program for cervical cancer, has increased public awareness of this deadly disease.

Cervical cancer kills some 253,500 women worldwide each year, according to the National Cervical Cancer Coalition (NCCC). This threat has prompted a concerted effort of research on the causes of cervical cancer, and effectivetreatments in recent years.

The researchers found that a virus called Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) causes at least 70% of cervical cancers. Following this discovery, have developed a vaccine that protects girls for example, aged 11 and 26, two common strains of HPV.

Moreover, though not considered actually cause cervical cancer, factors that increase the risk of contracting the disease. These risk factorsinclude:

The long-term use of birth control pills: the use of birth control pills for more than four years, may increase the risk of cervical cancer among women with HPV infection.
There is no regular testing, cervical cancer is more common among women who do not have regular Pap tests.
HPV infection: HPV infection has not been completely removed can cause cervical cancer in some women. Since these viruses are transmitted by sexual contactincreases the risk of HPV infection with number of sexual partners.
Smoking: snuff increases the risk of cervical cancer in women infected with HPV.
weakened immune system, HIV infection or the use of drugs that suppress the immune system, increases the risk of cervical cancer.

Knowing the causes of cervical cancer risk factors, can help prevent women from contracting the disease.

However,when a woman was diagnosed with cervical cancer, which is facing a very difficult decision. What treatment is most effective? The choice of treatment?

Cancer treatment is a controversial issue as soon as you venture outside the realm of mainstream medical authority in the field of alternative medicine. There are many good reasons for this controversy. In short, the conflict between freedom and order informationInterest (income).

Health care is an industry of billions of dollars annually in the U.S. only. Is the treatment of cancer for a turnover of U.S. $ 72.1 million in 2004, according to the National Cancer Institute. E naive hope that a profitable industry will put the interests of the public interest before his own being.

In fact, a recent "60 Minutes" documentary, there are twice as many lobbyists working for the pharmaceutical industryWe are members of Congress. They are paid to solicit support from the producers of Law for legislation that protects the interests of drug manufacturers, and to discredit alternative cancer treatments in the media.

alternative treatments and cures for cancer have shown have been widely documented in the last hundred years. Unfortunately, much of this information has been suppressed, discredited or deliberately, because it represents a threat to the interestsbenefit from patented treatments.

If it is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss alternative treatments for cancer, here are some general guidelines to help you find the information useful for your own personal use and research education.

First, you must be willing to be your own authority. It s your health and your life, after all, and you have the right to make the final decision on the treatment you have additional information receive.Theaccess, the best position to make a truly informed decision.

Second, you must be willing to look beyond conventional sources of the mainstream, if you really want to find information is deleted.

Third, the criteria should allow for options to include anecdotal evidence, because it will never be approved by the FDA, double-blind studies, to support any treatment that can not be patented, or administered in profit important.

The answer to the memorydiscredit effective alternative treatments of any kind is "There is no clinical evidence that it works." While this is true, it is also misleading. This does not mean that treatment does not work. No clinical trials because there was a clinical trial, and never will be, because most alternatives can not be patented. Therefore, there is no incentive to pay for clinical trials.

Anecdotes, first-person accounts of success, alternative cancer treatmentsoffering new options and directions to explore. research motivated by the most liberal countries can support, often in their testimony, and help you make informed decisions that can lead to successful healing, even cancer.